59--CONTROL-MODULE
DEPT OF DEFENSE.DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY.DLA MARITIME.DLA MARITIME COLUMBUS.DLA WEAPONS SUPPORT · Response deadline: Tue, 17 Nov 2026
What the government is buying
DLA Maritime Columbus, part of the Defense Logistics Agency's weapons support directorate, is soliciting bids for a control module. The item falls under Federal Supply Classification 59, which covers electrical and electronic equipment components.
NAICS code 334515 designates Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals. This industry classification covers manufacturers that produce instruments used to test electrical properties and signals. Control modules in this category typically include devices that regulate, monitor, or manage electrical systems and operations—common in defense applications for weapons systems, shipboard equipment, or test and measurement apparatus.
see the solicitation for the specific technical requirements, performance specifications, and intended end-use of this control module.
Key facts
| Agency | DLA Maritime (Defense Logistics Agency) |
| Notice type | Combined Synopsis/Solicitation |
| Solicitation number | SPE7M127U1111 |
| NAICS | 334515 |
| Set-aside | None (full and open competition) |
| Response deadline | November 17, 2026 |
| Place of performance | Not specified in notice |
Who can bid
This solicitation is full and open competition with no small business set-aside. Any responsible offeror—large or small business—may submit a bid. Small businesses compete directly against all other qualified entities.
That said, small manufacturers registered under NAICS 334515 should evaluate their capabilities against the specific requirements. If you are a small business in electrical instrument manufacturing, consider whether you have:
- Existing production capacity for defense-grade control modules
- Experience with DLA's quality assurance and testing protocols
- Approved manufacturing processes for mission-critical components
If your business qualifies as a small manufacturer but lacks the scale or technical depth for this requirement, explore subcontracting opportunities with prime bidders or pursue a teaming arrangement. The absence of a set-aside means primes have no statutory incentive to subcontract with small businesses, but many seek specialized suppliers for niche components.
How to put together a competitive bid
For DLA weapon systems procurements, bidders should focus on these elements:
Technical compliance and traceability: DLA evaluates offers against detailed performance specifications. Ensure every requirement in the solicitation has a corresponding response. Document your testing capabilities—NAICS 334515 work demands verified electrical performance data.
Quality assurance documentation: Defense supply contracts require robust quality systems. Prepare evidence of ISO 9001 or AS9100 certification if applicable. Be ready to provide material certifications, test reports, and configuration management records.
Past performance: If you have delivered similar control modules or electrical instruments to DLA, Defense, or other federal agencies, highlight this with contract numbers, quantities, and performance ratings. First-time DLA bidders should emphasize commercial experience with comparable technical requirements.
Pricing strategy: Full and open competition typically yields aggressive pricing. Analyze DLA's historical pricing for similar 59-class items through FPDS or GSA tools if available. Factor in Special Test Equipment, tooling, or non-recurring engineering costs if the module requires custom development.
Small business advantages: Though no set-aside applies, note any small business size status in your proposal. Some DLA contracts include small business participation evaluation factors, and you remain eligible for subcontracting plans in any future follow-on work.
Next steps
Read the full solicitation SPE7M127U1111 on SAM.gov immediately. Combined Synopsis/Solicitation notices frequently include essential details—specifications, packaging requirements, inspection criteria, and award timelines—that do not appear in the metadata summary.
Note the deadline: Responses are due November 17, 2026. This provides approximately two weeks from the posted date of November 2, 2026. Given the technical nature of control modules under FSC 59, allocate sufficient time for internal engineering review and quality documentation preparation before submission.
View the official notice on SAM.gov →